Chiang Mai authorities seek airport fee adjustments to protect northern aviation

The Chiang Mai governor has called for a review of fees at Chiang Mai Airport after some airlines postponed plans to open routes to the north. Higher-than-expected parking and ground-handling charges have led small and low-cost carriers to delay or reconsider route expansion, which could hinder the recovery of tourism in the province and the region.

Airport fees became a contentious issue after reports that domestic and foreign airlines were reconsidering plans because parking and ground service costs exceeded fares customers find acceptable. The governor emphasized that access to Chiang Mai should carry reasonable costs, since air connectivity plays a key role in the local economy—supporting tourism, trade in local products, and intercity activity across the north.

Local authorities in nearby provinces such as Mae Hong Son and Lamphun have also expressed concern, noting that reduced or delayed flights to regional airports could cost these areas economic opportunities. The governor of Mae Hong Son commented that high parking fees are a major barrier for low-cost carriers trying to test new markets, while Chiang Mai tourism operators said airlines postponing entries is a warning sign that clear incentives are needed to bring carriers back.

The Ministry of Transport and the Department of Airports have acknowledged the problem and convened meetings with provincial airport authorities to consider appropriate measures. These include reviewing service rates for domestic and regional routes, creating promotional packages for new routes, and negotiating case-by-case agreements with smaller airlines to find mutually beneficial terms. Central authorities stressed that any fee adjustments must preserve the airport’s service capacity and safety.

For residents and tourism businesses in Chiang Mai, airline cancellations or delays could mean fewer visitors in the off-season. Community tours and small enterprises that rely on domestic and international tourists may suffer revenue losses. Reduced air access would also raise travel costs for tourists and add expense for traders of local products, undermining Chiang Mai’s competitiveness in broader markets.

Stakeholders have proposed solutions such as forming a public-private committee to assess the true costs of providing airport services, developing financial support plans for pilot routes, and offering short-term incentives like reduced parking fees during trial flights. They stressed that remedies must balance service standards, safety, and the airport’s financial sustainability. If a balanced approach is achieved, Chiang Mai and the north can maintain their roles as national tourism and transport hubs over the long term.